100% Pass Quiz High-quality Adobe - AD0-E902 - Valid Braindumps Adobe Workfront Fusion Professional Pdf

Our online resources and events enable you to focus on learning just what you want on your timeframe. You get access to every AD0-E902 exams files and there continuously update our AD0-E902 Study Materials; these exam updates are supplied free of charge to our valued customers. Get the best AD0-E902 exam Training; as you study from our exam-files.

CertkingdomPDF provides Adobe AD0-E902 desktop-based practice software for you to test your knowledge and abilities. The AD0-E902 desktop-based practice software has an easy-to-use interface. You will become accustomed to and familiar with the free demo for Adobe AD0-E902 Exam Questions. Exam self-evaluation techniques in our AD0-E902 desktop-based software include randomized questions and timed tests. These tools assist you in assessing your ability and identifying areas for improvement to pass the Adobe certification exam.

>> Valid Braindumps AD0-E902 Pdf <<

Latest AD0-E902 study materials

To assist applicants preparing for the Adobe Workfront Fusion Professional (AD0-E902) real certification exam effectively, CertkingdomPDF offers Adobe AD0-E902 desktop practice test software and a web-based practice exam besides actual PDF AD0-E902 exam questions. These AD0-E902 Practice Exams replicate the Adobe AD0-E902 real exam scenario and offer a trusted evaluation of your preparation. No internet connection is necessary to use the AD0-E902 Windows-based practice test software.

Adobe AD0-E902 Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic	Details
Topic 1	Foundational Technical Concepts: This section of the exam measures the skills of Fusion Developers and covers core technical concepts related to data transformation, function nesting, and expression formation in Fusion. Candidates must understand how to modify field formats, use appropriate functions, and work with data manipulation techniques. One key skill evaluated is selecting the correct function to transform data between different formats.
Topic 2	Scenario Design and Architecture: This section of the exam measures the skills of Solution Architects and focuses on designing and structuring Fusion scenarios efficiently. Candidates must determine the correct steps to parse JSON, perform data lookups, and distinguish between different triggers. Understanding system limitations, module selection, and timezone handling is also essential. One key skill assessed is identifying the appropriate method for uploading documents while managing access controls.
Topic 3	Testing and Error Handling: This section of the exam measures the skills of Quality Assurance Engineers and evaluates the principles of testing and error handling in Fusion. Candidates must define test plans and test cases, identify directives for handling unreliable services, and configure custom error handling mechanisms. One specific skill tested is applying the correct error-handling directive to manage service disruptions.
Topic 4	Working with APIs: This section of the exam measures the skills of Integration Specialists and assesses knowledge of API interactions within Fusion. Candidates must handle rate-limiting errors, identify ways to integrate third-party APIs and determine the correct module types when built-in functionalities are unavailable. One critical skill evaluated is implementing a solution for API rate limits to ensure seamless integration.

Adobe Workfront Fusion Professional Sample Questions (Q17-Q22):

NEW QUESTION # 17
In a scenario that searches for recently completed tasks, a user notices the following input and output for a date transformation.
Input: March 3, 2021 10:34 AM Output: March 1, 2021 10:34 AM
Which expression produces this date transformation?

A. subDays(now,2)
B. addDays(today; -4)
C. addHours(now; -48)

Answer: A

Explanation:
* Understanding the Date Transformation:
* Input:March 3, 2021, 10:34 AM
* Output:March 1, 2021, 10:34 AM
* The transformation subtracts2 daysfrom the input date without altering the time.
* Why Option A is Correct:
* subDays(now,2) subtracts exactly 2 days from the given date and time.
* It preserves the time component of the input (10:34 AM) while shifting the date backward by 2 days, which matches the given output.
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option B ("addHours(now; -48)"): While subtracting 48 hours also results in a 2-day difference, this approach directly modifies the time. The resulting time could shift if the operation crosses daylight saving changes or edge cases with leap seconds. It is less reliable compared to subDays.
* Option C ("addDays(today; -4)"): This would subtract 4 days, which does not match the transformation shown in the example.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion: Date and Time Functions
* Workfront Community: Using Date and Time Expressions

NEW QUESTION # 18
Which statement about the differences between instant and polling triggers is true?

A. To keep track of records processed, instant triggers store received webhooks in a queue, whereas polling triggers remember which records have already been processed
B. Only polling triggers can be set to run on a schedule and should be used to avoid shutdown of third- party systems during working hours
C. A user must set up a webhook in Fusion to use Instant Triggers that make polling triggers easier to use and more reliable in scenarios
D. A user should use instant triggers when available because instant triggers allow Fusion to process bundles of data faster than polling triggers

Answer: D

Explanation:
* Understanding Instant and Polling Triggers:
* Instant Triggers:
* Rely on webhooks to receive real-time data from a third-party system.
* The external system sends a notification (webhook) to Fusion whenever an event occurs, triggering the scenario immediately.
* Polling Triggers:
* Regularly check (poll) the third-party system for new or updated records at scheduled intervals.
* These are slower because they involve repeated API requests.
* Why Option B is Correct:
* Speed and Efficiency:
* Instant triggers process data faster because they act immediately upon receiving a webhook. Polling triggers, on the other hand, may take time depending on the polling frequency and can result in unnecessary delays.
* Reduced Load on Systems:
* Instant triggers generate fewer API calls than polling triggers, which continuously check for new records even if no changes have occurred.
* Best Practice: Use instant triggers whenever supported by the third-party system to ensure faster and more efficient scenario execution.
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option A ("Instant triggers store received webhooks in a queue"):
* Webhooks do not store data in a queue; they simply notify Fusion of events in real-time.
Polling triggers also do not store records but remember the last processed record.
* Option C ("A user must set up a webhook in Fusion"):
* Instant triggers require setting up webhooks in the external system, not in Fusion. Fusion provides the webhook endpoint, but the user must configure the source system to send data.
* Option D ("Only polling triggers can be set to run on a schedule"):
* This is incorrect because instant triggers do not rely on schedules; they operate in real-time.
Polling triggers, however, run on schedules and are used when instant triggers are unavailable.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Triggers Documentation
* Workfront Community: Differences Between Instant and Polling Triggers Instant triggers are the preferred option when available, as they provide real-time data processing with greater speed and efficiency than polling triggers.

NEW QUESTION # 19
A custom API call to a web service is used inside of a high volume iteration. The module that calls the web service sometimes returns an error - 429: Too many requests.
Which two actions may be used to address this error? (Choose two.)

A. Use an ignore directive on the module generating the error
B. Use a break directive on the module generating the error
C. Add a sleep module just prior to the module generating the error
D. Add a module to test the service for errors

Answer: C,D

NEW QUESTION # 20
A global customer has end users who input date and currency data into fields in inconsistent formats. Despite continued training efforts, this continues to be an issue. Unfortunately, the third-party service that the end users are using does not support forcing a required field format. These input mistakes do not happen frequently, but they currently stop the scenario from executing after the default three retries.
In Fusion, which action can the admin take to ensure that errors are corrected after they occur in a scenario?

A. Set up an error handling path that will catch errors in the end user's inputs and message the users in an email update that they need to try again.
B. Use the switch module to catch dates not in the required format and convert the common misused patterns into the appropriate format to prevent the scenario from stopping after three failed executions.
C. Select storing of Incomplete Executions in the scenario settings. The customer admin can then filter and search the execution history to resolve errors as they occur.

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Understanding the Scenario:
* The issue involves end users inputting inconsistent date and currency formats that result in errors in a Workfront Fusion scenario.
* The default behavior of Fusion stops the scenario after three retries due to input mismatches or invalid formats.
* Why Option A is Correct:
* Storing Incomplete Executions: In Adobe Workfront Fusion, enabling "Store incomplete executions" in the scenario settings allows administrators to capture incomplete runs without fully stopping the entire process. This feature stores all relevant data, even from incomplete runs, allowing administrators to identify and correct input issues manually.
* Error Troubleshooting: By reviewing incomplete executions, admins can pinpoint where the scenario failed, resolve the issue, and potentially reprocess those incomplete records, preventing complete scenario stoppage.
* Why Option B is Incorrect:
* The "switch module" can handle specific input variations, but it is not a comprehensive solution for handling unexpected or inconsistent formats entered by end users. While it might mitigate some errors, it does not address the root cause and can miss unanticipated input patterns.
* Why Option C is Incorrect:
* Setting up an error handling path to notify users and request corrections adds an additional manual step for users but does not resolve the problem efficiently within Fusion. Moreover, this solution does not prevent the scenario from halting after retries.
* Steps to Enable Storing Incomplete Executions:
* Navigate to the scenario in Adobe Workfront Fusion.
* Open theScenario Settingsby clicking the gear icon.
* Enable the optionStore Incomplete Executionsunder Execution settings.
* Save the settings and activate the scenario.
* How This Solves the Problem:
* Enabling this setting ensures that no data is lost when the scenario fails due to inconsistent inputs.
Admins can access the incomplete executions through the scenario execution history, apply necessary corrections, and retry specific records or steps as needed.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Scenario Settings
* Workfront Community: Handling Incomplete Executions

NEW QUESTION # 21
A web service provides the following array named "Colors":

Which expression returns the first ID in the array?

Answer: C

Explanation:
* Understanding the Array and the Task:
* Input Array (Colors):
[
{ "ID": "22342", "name": "Red" },
{ "ID": "33495", "name": "Blue" }
]
* Goal: Extract the first ID from the array, which is "22342".
* Why Option B is Correct:
* The expressionget(map(2.Colors; ID); 1):
* map(2.Colors; ID): Iterates over the array 2.Colors and extracts the ID field from each object. This creates a new array containing just the IDs:["22342", "33495"].
* get(...; 1): Retrieves the first element of the newly created array, which is "22342".
* Why the Other Options are Incorrect:
* Option A (map(2.Colors; ID; ID; 1)):
* This syntax is invalid because the additional ID and 1 parameters are misplaced. The map function requires only two arguments: the array and the field to map.
* Option C (map(get(2.Colors; ID); 1)):
* This incorrectly attempts to use get inside map. The get function does not return a field for mapping, so the syntax is invalid.
* How the Expression Works:
* Step 1: map(2.Colors; ID)
* Extracts the ID field from each object in the Colors array.
* Output: ["22342", "33495"].
* Step 2: get(...; 1)
* Retrieves the first element of the mapped array.
* Output: "22342".
* Use Case in Workfront Fusion:
* This approach is commonly used when processing arrays in Fusion scenarios, ensuring specific elements are accessed without additional looping or complex logic.
References and Supporting Documentation:
* Adobe Workfront Fusion Functions Documentation
* Workfront Community: Using Map and Get Functions
By combining map and get, this expression efficiently extracts the first ID from the array, ensuring correct and reliable results.

NEW QUESTION # 22
......

It is of great importance to consolidate all key knowledge points of the AD0-E902 exam. It is difficult for you to summarize by yourself. It is a complicated and boring process. We will collect all relevant reference books of the AD0-E902 exam written by famous authors from the official website. And it is not easy and will cost a lot of time and efforts. At the same time, it is difficult to follow and trace the changes of the AD0-E902 Exam, but our professional experts are good at this for you. Just buy our AD0-E902 study materials, you will succeed easily!

New AD0-E902 Exam Duration: https://www.certkingdompdf.com/AD0-E902-latest-certkingdom-dumps.html